This summer marks the 10th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges, and it’s an opportunity to ...

President Trump’s Justice Department (DOJ) has the back of Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), attempting to use an obscure law to protect her from a libel lawsuit. The administration wants to largely ...

Jim Obergefell shares how his love story became the catalyst for one of the most pivotal civil rights victories in U.S.

The ballot board had to determine if the petitions for the Ohio Equal Rights Amendment should be circulated as one or more ...

April 4, 2017 - The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals rules that the Civil Rights Act prohibits workplace discrimination against LGBTQ employees, after Kimberly Hively sues Ivy Tech Community College for ...

I think there are a lot of people who are rightfully relieved,’ Sarah McBride, the first openly transgender member of congress, tells The Independent ...

The following is the July 1, 2025, Congressional Research Service In Focus report, Proposed Defense Funding in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1, Title II). From the report Spending Plans for ...

The Respect for Marriage Act, enacted in 2022, requires the federal government and all states to recognize the marriages of same-sex and interracial couples performed validly in any state.

We have received text from S. 2201: LGBTQ+ Panic Defense Prohibition Act of 2025. This bill was received on 2025-06-27, and currently has 13 cosponsors.

We are who we’ve been waiting for. On this 10-year anniversary of marriage equality, we toast to what we have and what we will fight to keep! Happy gay marriage anniversary, and happy Pride! Sandy ...

By Jeanne Rizzo and Pali Cooper– San Francisco Gay Pride weekend marks the anniversary of our first date—the one and only anniversary we celebrated from 1989 until 2008. When Gavin Newsom defied DOMA ...

The Supreme Court finally agreed on June 26, 2015—exactly two years to the day after it overturned the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), and 12 years after its 6–3 decision in Lawrence v.